Barskoon,Horse Festival, Kyrgyzstan.
Please pay attention to the exhibitionist on the right...
Or, what they will never tell you about this country.
Last week I attended my first press conference since I am working with OHCHR. This press conference is culminating four months of joint investigations between OHCHR and the Office of the Kyrgyz Ombudsman started on October 2008 after the riot in Nookat (a town in the South-Western Osh Oblast of Kyrgyzstan) and the subsequent tough repression enforced by police forces and local courts. At my arrival the report was already written but Dyma (Kyrgyz Ombudsman’s team), Erlan (NUNV and Legal Officer, OHCHR) and Saltanat (my direct supervisor and National Program Officer, OHCHR) informed me about what had happened. To use the words of the official report (hereby translated from Russian):
“Annual celebration of Orozo-Ait and Kurman-Ait is a state-wide event throughout the whole territory of the country. (…) The festivities include the prayer (ait-namaz), cooking and distribution of food, including free meals. Starting from 2005 such celebrations have been conducted in the center of Nookat under the guidance of local public administration and usually were accompanied by free distribution of pilaf and drawing of prizes. (…) But on October 1, 2008 the celebration of Orozo-Ait in the center of Nookat, which has become a tradition since 2005 based on the permission of authorities, was unexpectedly prohibited. (…) While the local population was informed by the authorities on the celebration at the stadium beforehand, actual actions on prohibition were completely unexpected by the citizens and resulted in a spontaneous rally near the building of the rayon public administration. The verdict of the court says that the mass disorder was a planned and organized event (but written communications from the staff of law enforcement structures say the opposite). (…) According to the witnesses, the indignation of people increased after they saw faces covered with blood, as well as people who were detained and beaten by the police in the administration building. The rally turned into a forced confrontation only when the police started to disperse the people with batons. (…) According to those detained, ten of them were shown a video, which recorded their presence in the center of Nookat on October 1, 2008. At the same time these video tapes did not contain any evidence of their complicity in mass disorder and other crimes that other detainees were incriminated with. (…) In addition to the State Committee of National Security and the Rayon Police Department, the lists of Hizb-ut-Tahrir religious extremists are also available in urban and rural municipalities (…) the religious extremists’ lists included complete families, minor children and aged citizens. Nobody knows what criteria were applied by local authorities for the compilation of these lists, as according to the available information, each representative of local administration has his own subjective concept of that. Among the criteria which were used to discover Hizb-ut-Tahrir members, the representative of rayon public administration used the following: wearing of hijab, a beard, presence of prohibited literature as well as behavior that differs from the behavior of other people. (…) The lists complied by urban and rural municipalities were later used for repressions, though the people that were in the lists never knew about that. The case does not say anything on the registration of detention on the Nookat Rayon Police Department, while all those convicted claim that the first detentions, interrogation without the presence of the lawyer and the beatings happened in the Nookat Police department. The extracts from the case which show the dates of detention and the dates of court warrant are evidence of a gross violation of the 48-hour detention period without the warrant of the court. According to the population of Nookat, the representative of law-enforcement agencies asked them to pay money for the release of their relatives. Unlawful expropriation of property and money was also performed in respect of the detained persons. Those interviewed claimed that the police officers had been detaining the population of Nookat rayon until October 15, 2008 and asked them for the buyout to stay free. (…) According to the detainees and the people from Nookat, the law-enforcement officers insisted that those detained write a denunciation on 20 persons. One of those detained, who was unable to withstand the torture, called one fictitious named. After the law enforcement officers checked this information and realized that it was false, they again tortured the person under investigation. (…) There were no records on injured policemen either in the Crime record book or the Book of information messages. The relatives of those detained were not informed by the investigation bodies on the facts of their detainment. The relatives of those detained also informed that they were not allowed to meet the detainees during the investigation. They saw them for the first time during the court proceedings. (…) One of those arrested was unable to walk due to the torture (…). Despite bad health status of the persons who were tortured, as well as visible signs of bodily damage, the court, which had issued an arrest warrant in respect of those detained, did not take into account these circumstances and failed to take any action.
Tortures and cruel treatment
I think that for today is enough, this post is already too long.
Tomorrow, maybe, I will tell you what happened in front of the court. Just one tip for those who were so brave to read all the above:
PS: today I will participate to the briefing of the Inquiry Commission under the Ombudsman of the Kyrgyz Republic on Nookat events. Apart from me, National, International, Regional, Bilateral and Multilater institution are expected to come and discuss about the report you red in this post. I will keep you posted on what will come next.